Debris Examination Item 1 - Flaperon Identification: Difference between revisions

MH370 DECODED
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:
<h2>Debris Examination Item 1 - Flaperon Identification </h2>
<h2>Debris Examination Item 1 - Flaperon Identification </h2>
<div style="float:right; margin-right:2em;"><html><a href="/Debris Examination Reports" class="nav-btn">List of Debris Examination Reports</a></html></div>
<div style="float:right; margin-right:2em;"><html><a href="/Debris Examination Reports" class="nav-btn">List of Debris Examination Reports</a></html></div>
<h5>Safety Investigation Report (2018) Appendix 1.12A</h5>
<h5>Safety Investigation Report (2018) Appendix 1.12A-1</h5>
<h3>Summary</h3>
<h3>Summary</h3>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
<h5>1) Item 1 - Right Flaperon </h5>
<h5>Item 1 - Right Flaperon </h5>
<p>Item No. 1 was found on 29 July 2015 in Saint-Denis, Réunion Island. Réunion Island is a French territory in the Indian Ocean. </p>
<p>Item No. 1 was found on 29 July 2015 in Saint-Denis, Réunion Island. Réunion Island is a French territory in the Indian Ocean. </p>
<p>This item was one of the biggest and complete part of an aircraft found washed ashore. The item was retrieved by the local French authorities and shipped to General Delegate of Armament Aeronautical Technique (DGA/TA) facility in Toulouse for detailed examination. Because of a court case pending in Paris, the part was taken custody by the French Investigative Judge, as evidence for a criminal investigation. </p>
<p>This item was one of the biggest and complete part of an aircraft found washed ashore. The item was retrieved by the local French authorities and shipped to General Delegate of Armament Aeronautical Technique (DGA/TA) facility in Toulouse for detailed examination. Because of a court case pending in Paris, the part was taken custody by the French Investigative Judge, as evidence for a criminal investigation. </p>
Line 21: Line 21:
   <iframe class="PDFiframe" src="https://cache.mh370wiki.net/pdf/reports/SIR2018/Set 2/Appendix-1.12A-1-Item-1-Flaperon-Identification.pdf"></iframe>
   <iframe class="PDFiframe" src="https://cache.mh370wiki.net/pdf/reports/SIR2018/Set 2/Appendix-1.12A-1-Item-1-Flaperon-Identification.pdf"></iframe>
</html>
</html>
<p style="text-align:center"><u>Source</u>: Safety Investigation Report 2018 Appendix 1.12A {{RefID:SIR-APP-SET2}}
<p style="text-align:center"><u>Source</u>: Safety Investigation Report 2018 Appendix 1.12A-1 {{RefID:SIR-APP-SET2}}


<h3>Additional Notes</h3>
<h3>Additional Notes</h3>
Line 27: Line 27:
<p>The examination of the flaperon at DGA/TA revealed the following damages: </p>
<p>The examination of the flaperon at DGA/TA revealed the following damages: </p>
<ul class="ulNone" style="list-style:none">
<ul class="ulNone" style="list-style:none">
<li>a) the inboard and outboard hinge fittings were fractured in two places; at the level of the leading edge and on the lower surface of the flaperon; </li>
<li>a) the inboard and outboard hinge fittings were fractured in two places; at the level of the leading edge and on the lower surface of the flaperon; </li>
<li>b) the fracture surfaces on the hinge fittings were highly corroded; </li>
<li>b) the fracture surfaces on the hinge fittings were highly corroded; </li>
<li>c) the ribs at the edge of the flaperon showed, in their metallic area, holes due to corrosion; </li>
<li>c) the ribs at the edge of the flaperon showed, in their metallic area, holes due to corrosion; </li>
<li>d) the leading edge showed dents and cracks; </li>
<li>d) the leading edge showed dents and cracks; </li>
<li>e) the trailing edge was generally broken; </li>
<li>e) the trailing edge was generally broken; </li>
<li>f) the lower and upper surface panels showed localised dents and the upper surface had a large crack; and </li>
<li>f) the lower and upper surface panels showed localised dents and the upper surface had a large crack; and </li>
<li>g) the mounting attachment zones on each side of the flaperon were damaged or broken off. </li>
<li>g) the mounting attachment zones on each side of the flaperon were damaged or broken off. </li>
</ul>
</ul>
<p>In addition, the flaperon was covered with a colony of barnacles. </p>
<p>In addition, the flaperon was covered with a colony of barnacles. </p>

Latest revision as of 06:58, 14 September 2025

Debris Examination Item 1 - Flaperon Identification

Safety Investigation Report (2018) Appendix 1.12A-1

Summary

Item 1 - Right Flaperon

Item No. 1 was found on 29 July 2015 in Saint-Denis, Réunion Island. Réunion Island is a French territory in the Indian Ocean.

This item was one of the biggest and complete part of an aircraft found washed ashore. The item was retrieved by the local French authorities and shipped to General Delegate of Armament Aeronautical Technique (DGA/TA) facility in Toulouse for detailed examination. Because of a court case pending in Paris, the part was taken custody by the French Investigative Judge, as evidence for a criminal investigation.

The part identification, detailed examination and analysis were carried out at DGA/TA in Toulouse under the directive and jurisdiction of the French Investigative judge. Although the name plate was missing, which could have provided immediate traceability to the aircraft (9M-MRO), the part was confirmed to be a right flaperon of the aircraft 9M-MRO, by tracing the identification numbers of the internal parts of the flaperon to their manufacturing records at EADS CASA, Spain.

Source: Safety Investigation Report 2018:1 Factual Information/1.12/1.12.3 SIR-2018

Source: Safety Investigation Report 2018 Appendix 1.12A-1 SIR-APP-SET2

Additional Notes

The examination of the flaperon at DGA/TA revealed the following damages:

  • a) the inboard and outboard hinge fittings were fractured in two places; at the level of the leading edge and on the lower surface of the flaperon;
  • b) the fracture surfaces on the hinge fittings were highly corroded;
  • c) the ribs at the edge of the flaperon showed, in their metallic area, holes due to corrosion;
  • d) the leading edge showed dents and cracks;
  • e) the trailing edge was generally broken;
  • f) the lower and upper surface panels showed localised dents and the upper surface had a large crack; and
  • g) the mounting attachment zones on each side of the flaperon were damaged or broken off.

In addition, the flaperon was covered with a colony of barnacles.

Most of them were on the upper surface (extrados).

Refer to Appendix 1.12A-2 for details.


Source: Safety Investigation Report 2018:1 Factual Information/1.12/1.12.3 SIR-2018